| UP (discussion topics) | TOP (Cherryh-homepage) |

message 0102



Parts of this message can be found in the following threads:
>From: nancy ott <ott@ansoft.com>
>Subject: Re: Cherryhlist
>Date: Thu, 1 Apr 93 9:40:57 EST

> [Lesley's musings on the significance of the age of 17 in males deleted]
> 
> I think this would make a good question for the UseNet Oracle Lesley!  But 
> the short answer is:  17 is a disastrous age for all males, fictional or 
> not.
> 
> Ian Davis                                     davis@licre.ludwig.edu.au


Aren't Niun, Raen Meth-Maren and Altair Jones about 17, too?  (Or the
equivalent in mri years.)  Plus Pyotr and Sascha from the Russian
fantasies.  Seems like 17 is a popular age to have disastrous problems
(or, as a friend who's a social worker at a halfway house put it,
"issues to address") -- regardless of sex or species.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
nancy ott      |  The way I must enter leads through darkness
               |  To darkness.
ott@ansoft.com |
               |                - Shikibu
               |

Copyright by the author of the original message.
HTML formatting by Andreas Wandelt (look here for email address) .