| UP (discussion topics) | TOP
(Cherryh-homepage) |
message 0102
Parts of this message can be found in the following threads:
>From: nancy ott <ott@ansoft.com>
>Subject: Re: Cherryhlist
>Date: Thu, 1 Apr 93 9:40:57 EST
> [Lesley's musings on the significance of the age of 17 in males deleted]
>
> I think this would make a good question for the UseNet Oracle Lesley! But
> the short answer is: 17 is a disastrous age for all males, fictional or
> not.
>
> Ian Davis davis@licre.ludwig.edu.au
Aren't Niun, Raen Meth-Maren and Altair Jones about 17, too? (Or the
equivalent in mri years.) Plus Pyotr and Sascha from the Russian
fantasies. Seems like 17 is a popular age to have disastrous problems
(or, as a friend who's a social worker at a halfway house put it,
"issues to address") -- regardless of sex or species.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
nancy ott | The way I must enter leads through darkness
| To darkness.
ott@ansoft.com |
| - Shikibu
|
Copyright by the author of the original message.
HTML formatting by Andreas Wandelt (look here for email address)
.