| UP (discussion topics) | TOP
(Cherryh-homepage) |
message 0553
Parts of this message can be found in the following threads:
>Date: Mon, 20 Sep 93 13:39:01 -0400
>From: "Nancy Silberstein" <silbersteinn@a1.mscf.upenn.edu>
>Subject: Cherryhlist/Gaming
If I may chime in with my thoughts on the discussion of a Cherryh board
game:
1.) When you guys got past the simple child's game stage, you lost
me.
2.) On the other hand, I hate to discourage you because even the
homely oyster can create a pearl.
3.) On the other hand, I remain unthrilled by screens of code.
4.) There is no other hand.
The pearl cited in 2.):
Jo said that Cherryh rarely assumes the stance of "Author-all-knowing but
instead leaves you to see things through the characters', often biased,
views." I read that, and illumination broke. THAT'S another reason
Cherryh so fascinates me. I enjoy the challenge of seeing events through
the prism of a character's biases, experiences, and goals. Nifty.
Lesley, thanks for the explication of hani kinship webs. Has that
explanation made all clear to me? No. Is the problem with your
explanation? No. Do I see the value of an interest in pre-monarchial
Israel? Definitely.
njs 20-SEP-1993 08:53
Copyright by the author of the original message.
WWW formatting by Andreas Wandelt (look here for email address)
.