| UP (discussion topics) | TOP
(Cherryh-homepage) |
Hani induce 'un-Kifish' behavior in Kif
view full message
>From: nancy ott <ott@ansoft.com>
>Subject: cherryhlist
>Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 11:54:00 EST
(...)
The exception to this kifish "perfidy" [[loyalty only as long as leader
has enough sfik - AW]](as the other Compact species
view it), Skkukkuk/Vikkktimakkht's loyalty to Pyanfar Chanur, is
presented as a new and somewhat un-kifish development. (Perhaps it
was caused by his prolonged exposure to the hani?) And anyhow,
Pyanfar Chanur hadn't lost sfik yet; being satisfied with his current
lofty position, he'd have no reason to desert or turn on her.
(...)
- nancy
view full message
>From: Lesley Grant <lgrant>
>Subject: Re: C. J. Cherryh List
>Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 9:54:43 GMT
nancy says:
> The exception to this kifish "perfidy" (as the other Compact species
> view it), Skkukkuk/Vikkktimakkht's loyalty to Pyanfar Chanur, is
> presented as a new and somewhat un-kifish development. (Perhaps it
> was caused by his prolonged exposure to the hani?) And anyhow,
> Pyanfar Chanur hadn't lost sfik yet; being satisfied with his current
> lofty position, he'd have no reason to desert or turn on her.
Hilfy certainly seemed worried about _sharing_ the lift with
him (the word meaning something like "sharing prey")! Skkukkuk is quite
definitely shown as an exceptional Kif, and yes, I think it's 'haniization'
at work -- in _Chanur's Homecoming_ Pyanfar drives home the advantages of
tactics other than force, and watchs the possibilities 'dawn in his narrow
Kifish skull'. Having what Sikkukkukt wanted, he is one happy Kif (only
happy sfik-filled Kif have senses of humour, and you can't tell me that he
wasn't playing a (nasty) joke on Hilfy by setting her audience up exactly
the way Sikkukkukt's were :-)
(...)
Lesley
Copyright by the authors of the individual messages.
HTML formatting by Andreas Wandelt (look
here for email address).